https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
GitLab Migration User changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #24 from Hal Gentz ---
s/if some other thread locking/if some other thread locks/
Sorry, again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.___
mesa-dev mai
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #23 from Hal Gentz ---
s/blocks with/blocks from/
s/suspician/suspicion/
s/the mutex/the mutex is/
Apologies in advance for inconsistent back ticking and not spell checking. I
really wish I could edit replies.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #22 from Hal Gentz ---
Created attachment 144685
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=144685&action=edit
Requested patch (does not work)
I tried implementing your suggested patch, Uli, but it did not work.
XSync als
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Hal Gentz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop. |zegen...@protonmail.com
|o
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #21 from Hal Gentz ---
I just spotted that this got reopened today when going through my emails for
the first time in forever... this is unfortunate.
I'll take another swing at this sometime next week using Uli Schlachter's new
propo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #20 from Uli Schlachter ---
Random guess for where the regression comes from:
X11DRV_expect_error() is used to say "I expect that the next request might
fail":
https://github.com/wine-mirror/wine/blob/6d801377055911d914226a3c6af8d863
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Timothy Arceri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Michel Dänzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
tele4...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tele4...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #16 from Ian Romanick ---
(In reply to Hal Gentz from comment #10)
> Created attachment 143764 [details]
> Improved repo of the bug.
I would very much like to see this as a piglit test.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #15 from Hal Gentz ---
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2019-March/217153.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug._
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #14 from Hal Gentz ---
Created attachment 143767
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=143767&action=edit
Patch that fixes bug.
Hey,
This patch fixes this bug. I had to also patch `__glXSendErrorForXcb` because
`glXCr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #13 from Uli Schlachter ---
Created attachment 143766
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=143766&action=edit
A single-threaded reproducer
I think I came up with a single-threaded program reproducing the bug. More
det
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Hal Gentz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #143763|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Uli Schlachter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psyc...@znc.in
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #12 from Uli Schlachter ---
I took a look at this and I would guess that the bug is in mesa. However, I do
not want to built mesa myself and thus I will not test my theory.
The function __glXSendError() in mesa's src/glx/glx_error.c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Hal Gentz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zegen...@protonmail.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #11 from Hal Gentz ---
Created attachment 143765
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=143765&action=edit
Patch for printing out backtraces for possibly relevant functions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #7 from Samuel Sieb ---
Of course, as soon as I write that and try again, it crashes every time even
limited to one cpu. I must have just been lucky that one time or something.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #6 from Samuel Sieb ---
I can verify that limiting the program to one core allows it to start up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug._
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Samuel Sieb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam...@sieb.net
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Tapani Pälli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lem...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Nicholas Miell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||synapt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #4 from Ray Strode [halfline] ---
so looking a few stack frames up I see this:
err = xcb_request_check(c, cookie);•
if (err != NULL) {•
gc->vtable->destroy(gc);•
gc = NULL;•
•
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #3 from Ray Strode [halfline] ---
In your case the last request accounted for is 84 and the narrowed error event
sequence number is 82.
The code notices 82 is less than 84 and assumes the upper bits were off by one,
but what's really
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
--- Comment #2 from Ray Strode [halfline] ---
(In reply to Ray Strode [halfline] from comment #1)
> I guess if it's gotten to the assertion things have already gone pair shaped
> because that's happening when trying to send the error.
So this is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Ray Strode [halfline] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rstr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99781
Bug ID: 99781
Summary: Some Unity games fail assertion on startup in
glXCreateContextAttribsARB
Product: Mesa
Version: 13.0
Hardware: Other
OS: All
30 matches
Mail list logo
