On 14 June 2017 at 15:57, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> Thanks Emil. I assume this is fine for 17.1 stable as well then?
>
Indeed it is. Relaxing restrictions is always welcome ;-)
-Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.fr
Thanks Emil. I assume this is fine for 17.1 stable as well then?
- Chuck
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 9 June 2017 at 16:00, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> > Hi Emil,
> >
> >> Did you test the upstream versions or the distribution ones which tend
> >> to be patched?
> >
> >
On 9 June 2017 at 16:00, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
>> Did you test the upstream versions or the distribution ones which tend
>> to be patched?
>
>
> Both. I build 17.1.1 against the system supplied zlib-devel packages for
> 1.2.3 in EL6 and 1.2.7 on EL7. I then swapped out the zlib versio
Hi Emil,
Did you test the upstream versions or the distribution ones which tend
> to be patched?
>
Both. I build 17.1.1 against the system supplied zlib-devel packages for
1.2.3 in EL6 and 1.2.7 on EL7. I then swapped out the zlib version at
runtime via LD_LIBRARY_PATH with ones build from the
Hi Chuck,
On 8 June 2017 at 18:11, Chuck Atkins wrote:
> Testing with zlib versions 1.2.{3,4,5,6,7,8} showed no difference in
> functionality, correctness, or zlib API usage and 1.2.3 is the oldest
> version available in still actively deployed production Linux
> distributions (RHEL/CentOS 6 and
