On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 5:24:09 AM PDT Andres Gomez wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 11:57 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:28 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > > Curro pointed out that I should not just check for MACH, but use
> > > the
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 11:57 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:28 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > Curro pointed out that I should not just check for MACH, but use
> > the reads_accumulator_implicitly() helper, which would also prevent
> > the same bug with MAC and
On Sat, 2017-04-22 at 16:28 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Curro pointed out that I should not just check for MACH, but use
> the reads_accumulator_implicitly() helper, which would also prevent
> the same bug with MAC and SADA2 (if we ever decide to use them).
>
This seems to rely on commit
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> Curro pointed out that I should not just check for MACH, but use
> the reads_accumulator_implicitly() helper, which would also prevent
> the same bug with MAC and SADA2 (if we ever decide to use them).
>
> Cc: Francisco Jerez