On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> We should not call nouveau_bufctx_reset() inside a validate function.
This seems to contradict the changes introduced in nvc0_compute.c.
Worth explaining a bit better the dos and don'ts ?
-Emil
___
mesa-
On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>> We should not call nouveau_bufctx_reset() inside a validate function.
> This seems to contradict the changes introduced in nvc0_compute.c.
> Worth explaining a bit better the dos and don'ts ?
>
As th
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>>> We should not call nouveau_bufctx_reset() inside a validate function.
>> This seems to contradict the changes introduced in nvc0_compute.c.
>>
On 06/05/2016 11:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
We should not call nouveau_bufctx_reset() inside a validate function.
This seems to contradict the c
On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
We should not call nouveau_bufctx_reset() inside a validate function.
>>> This seems to cont
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> We should not call nouveau_bu
On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 17:56, Samuel
On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:13, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5
On 5 June 2016 at 23:00, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov
>>> wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 20
On 06/06/2016 12:08 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 23:00, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:17, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On S
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 23:00, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
>
> On 5 June
On 5 June 2016 at 23:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 June 2016 at 23:00, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5
On 06/06/2016 12:30 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 23:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 23:00, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 06/05/2016 11:50 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 June 2016 at 22:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sun
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 June 2016 at 23:22, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> You're arguing about clarity with the ~2 active developers/reviewers
>> who understand the code.
> What I'm saying is that with contradicting commit messages like this
> one there'll be little oth
14 matches
Mail list logo