On 2 May 2017 at 11:23, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Saturday, 2017-04-29 14:51:15 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> Drop the misleading "will not match the one returned by thread_create"
>> hunk and provide more clarity as to what/why GetCurrentThread() isn't
>> the solution w
On 29/04/17 14:51, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
Drop the misleading "will not match the one returned by thread_create"
hunk and provide more clarity as to what/why GetCurrentThread() isn't
the solution we're looking for.
Cc: José Fonseca
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
include/c11
On Saturday, 2017-04-29 14:51:15 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Drop the misleading "will not match the one returned by thread_create"
> hunk and provide more clarity as to what/why GetCurrentThread() isn't
> the solution we're looking for.
>
> Cc: José Fonseca
> Signed-off
From: Emil Velikov
Drop the misleading "will not match the one returned by thread_create"
hunk and provide more clarity as to what/why GetCurrentThread() isn't
the solution we're looking for.
Cc: José Fonseca
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
include/c11/threads_win32.h | 10 +++---
1 file