On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> The old logic would let all negative values go through unclamped, with
>> potentially disastrous results (probably trying to fetch viewport values
>> from random memor
LGTM.
Jose
From: srol...@vmware.com
Sent: 23 June 2014 21:08
To: Jose Fonseca; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; imir...@alum.mit.edu
Cc: Roland Scheidegger; 10.1 10.2
Subject: [PATCH] draw: (trivial) fix clamping of viewport index
From: Roland Scheidegger
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:08 PM, wrote:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> The old logic would let all negative values go through unclamped, with
> potentially disastrous results (probably trying to fetch viewport values
> from random memory locations). GL has undefined rendering for vp indices
> ou
From: Roland Scheidegger
The old logic would let all negative values go through unclamped, with
potentially disastrous results (probably trying to fetch viewport values
from random memory locations). GL has undefined rendering for vp indices
outside valid range but that's a bit too undefined...
(
