On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 29 April 2017 at 14:51, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> From: Emil Velikov
>>>
>>> Considering we cannot make dummy_thread a constant we might as well,
>>> initialise by the same funct
On 29 April 2017 at 14:51, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> Considering we cannot make dummy_thread a constant we might as well,
>> initialise by the same function that handles the actual thread info.
>>
>> This way we don'
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Considering we cannot make dummy_thread a constant we might as well,
> initialise by the same function that handles the actual thread info.
>
> This way we don't need to worry about mismatch between the initialiser
> a
On Tuesday, 2017-04-25 17:07:46 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Considering we cannot make dummy_thread a constant we might as well,
> initialise by the same function that handles the actual thread info.
>
> This way we don't need to worry about mismatch between the initialis
From: Emil Velikov
Considering we cannot make dummy_thread a constant we might as well,
initialise by the same function that handles the actual thread info.
This way we don't need to worry about mismatch between the initialiser
and initialising function.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
src/eg