On 25 July 2018 at 16:28, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> When this bit was added, it seems the some initialization code
> was omitted by mistake.
>
> Since stack-variables have kinda random contents, and we don't
> zero initialize the whole struct in these code-paths, we end up
> getting random-ish value
When this bit was added, it seems the some initialization code
was omitted by mistake.
Since stack-variables have kinda random contents, and we don't
zero initialize the whole struct in these code-paths, we end up
getting random-ish values for this bit.
Spotted by Coverity in the following CIDs:
