On 09/30/2014 01:26 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:17:31 Brian Paul wrote:
Same failure with LLVM 3.3.1 too.
Ok, that's what I did not try.
Sorry. I will try to followup immediately ...
Thanks, Mathias. But I'm about to post a patch that fixes things for
Hi,
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 13:17:31 Brian Paul wrote:
> Same failure with LLVM 3.3.1 too.
Ok, that's what I did not try.
Sorry. I will try to followup immediately ...
Greetings
Mathias
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
h
On 09/30/2014 01:16 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 09/30/2014 01:00 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Jose,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:42:24 Jose Fonseca wrote:
That said, the way we use these things are still a bit in flux. Mathias
has some pending patches. BTW, Mathis, should I submit your p
On 09/30/2014 01:00 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Jose,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:42:24 Jose Fonseca wrote:
That said, the way we use these things are still a bit in flux. Mathias
has some pending patches. BTW, Mathis, should I submit your patches
for making llvmpipe thread safe?
Me
Jose,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:42:24 Jose Fonseca wrote:
> That said, the way we use these things are still a bit in flux. Mathias
> has some pending patches. BTW, Mathis, should I submit your patches
> for making llvmpipe thread safe?
Mesa day for me. I did double check the mesa c
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:42:24 Jose Fonseca wrote:
> We're not the only one with similar needs. Webkit has similar needs.
> Though they opted by using LLVMCreateSimpleMCJITMemoryManager
> https://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Tools/ReducedFTL/ReducedFTL.c#L321
> and implemeti
Le mardi 23 septembre 2014, 16:23:03 Tom Stellard a écrit :
> LLVM commit r218316 removes the JITMemoryManager class, which is
> the parent for a seemingly important class in gallivm. In order to
> fix the build, I've wrapped most of lp_bld_misc.cpp in
> if HAVE_LLVM < 0x0306 and modifyed the
> lp
Hi Jose,
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:42:24 Jose Fonseca wrote:
> That said, the way we use these things are still a bit in flux. Mathias
> has some pending patches. BTW, Mathis, should I submit your patches
> for making llvmpipe thread safe? Also, what are your thoughts on this
> is
On 23/09/14 21:23, Tom Stellard wrote:
LLVM commit r218316 removes the JITMemoryManager class, which is
the parent for a seemingly important class in gallivm. In order to
fix the build, I've wrapped most of lp_bld_misc.cpp in
if HAVE_LLVM < 0x0306 and modifyed the
lp_build_create_jit_compiler_f
LLVM commit r218316 removes the JITMemoryManager class, which is
the parent for a seemingly important class in gallivm. In order to
fix the build, I've wrapped most of lp_bld_misc.cpp in
if HAVE_LLVM < 0x0306 and modifyed the
lp_build_create_jit_compiler_for_module() function to return false
for 3
10 matches
Mail list logo
