On 28/05/15 19:26, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Looks ok, it's massively simpler and shouldn't break as often.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Am 28.05.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
It doesn't do everything we want. In particular it doesn't allow to
detect jumps or return opcodes. Curren
Looks ok, it's massively simpler and shouldn't break as often.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger
Am 28.05.2015 um 17:57 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
> It doesn't do everything we want. In particular it doesn't allow to
> detect jumps or return opcodes. Currently we detect the x86's RET
> opcode.
>
> E
It doesn't do everything we want. In particular it doesn't allow to
detect jumps or return opcodes. Currently we detect the x86's RET
opcode.
Even though it's worse for LLVM 3.3, it's an improvement for LLVM 3.7,
which was totally busted.
---
scons/llvm.py | 4
