Bunch of spelling nits, etc.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Timothy Arceri
wrote:
> In GLES 3.1+ and GL 4.4+ there is no guarantee that interpolation
> qualifiers will match between stages so we cannot safely pack
> varyings using the current packing pass in Mesa.
>
> We also disable packing on
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:14 -0800, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:52:54PM +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > In GLES 3.1+ and GL 4.4+ there is no guarantee that interpolation
> > qualifiers will match between stages so we cannot safely pack
> > varyings using the current packing pas
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:52:54PM +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> In GLES 3.1+ and GL 4.4+ there is no guarantee that interpolation
> qualifiers will match between stages so we cannot safely pack
> varyings using the current packing pass in Mesa.
>
> We also disable packing on outward facing SSO a
In GLES 3.1+ and GL 4.4+ there is no guarantee that interpolation
qualifiers will match between stages so we cannot safely pack
varyings using the current packing pass in Mesa.
We also disable packing on outward facing SSO as these too are outside
the rule that guarantees the interpolation qualifi
