Timothy Arceri wrote
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 15:23 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
On 26/04/15 00:08, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 18:46 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented
On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 15:23 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
On 26/04/15 00:08, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 18:46 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented to use any binding point different to
Hi Alejandro
On 26 April 2015 at 14:23, Alejandro Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
On 26/04/15 00:08, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 18:46 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented to use any
On 26/04/15 00:08, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 18:46 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented to use any binding point different to 0.
---
Taking into account the explanation on the header
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 18:46 +0200, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented to use any binding point different to 0.
---
Taking into account the explanation on the header about the
variable binding (ast.h:553)
There was a typo on commit c0cd5b, doing it when explicit_binding
was false. This prevented to use any binding point different to 0.
---
Taking into account the explanation on the header about the
variable binding (ast.h:553)
/**
* Binding specified via GL_ARB_shading_language_420pack's
