On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 16:45 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > The server is the only thing that knows how to handle this scenario, and
> > it _can_ get this request, so you have to fix it there anyway.
>
> Actually no, the DRI2 code in the
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 09:40 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >> From: Dave Airlie
> > >>
> > >> This keeps track of the creat
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 09:40 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >> From: Dave Airlie
> >>
> >> This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
> >> it then blocks DRI2 fro
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
>> it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
>>
>> v2: check if w
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
> it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
>
> v2: check if we have a GLX drawable, which means we aren't a pbuffer,
>
On Mit, 2011-12-07 at 10:24 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
> it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
>
> v2: check if we have a GLX drawable, which means we aren't a pbuffer,
> a
From: Dave Airlie
This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
v2: check if we have a GLX drawable, which means we aren't a pbuffer,
avoid doing flush at all since its meant to be a no-op.
Suggested by
