On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2013 19:54, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2013 19:54, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com
On 17 September 2013 19:54, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
On 09/20/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
On 17 September 2013 19:54, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com
mailto:olva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com
mailto:olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Paul
On 09/20/2013 08:30 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/20/2013 09:50 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
[snip]
Since the SAMPLER_MODE setting allows us to trade off quality vs
performance, we're also interested to know whether a value less than
0x1f is sufficient to produce the performance improvement in
Wow, it's not often we as developers get to attribute an unexplained
performance improvement to silicon. I'm happy to say I guessed wrong here.
Did this start specifically with Haswell and is it likely this will persist
in future gen hardware - more specifically, what's the proper test by the
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mark Mueller markkmuel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Mark Mueller markkmuel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mark Mueller markkmuel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a
2x2
subspan, unless the application or the user
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mark Mueller markkmuel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mark Mueller markkmuel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a
2x2
subspan, unless the application or the user
On 12 September 2013 22:06, Chia-I Wu olva...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a 2x2
subspan, unless the application or the user requests a more accurate
approximation. This results in a less accurate
From: Chia-I Wu o...@lunarg.com
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a 2x2
subspan, unless the application or the user requests a more accurate
approximation. This results in a less accurate approximation. However, it
improves the performance of Xonotic with
15 matches
Mail list logo