On 02/18/2015 10:57 AM, Mark Janes wrote:
> This patch fixes a performance regression that causes our piglit CI
> system to slow by 50%. If anyone has time to take a look at this and
> provide a RB, it will improve the rate at which you get your piglit
> results.
When you send a message like this
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
Thanks Curro!
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
This patch fixes a performance regression that causes our piglit CI
system to slow by 50%. If anyone has time to take a look at this and
provide a RB, it will improve the rate at which you get your piglit
results.
-Mark
Francisco Jerez writes:
> This fixes a regression in the running time of P
Connor Abbott writes:
> I'll ask the same question I asked Jason when he did this for FS...
> did you verify that the new q_values is the same as the old one?
>
Yeah, I did.
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>> This fixes a regression in the running time of Piglit int
I'll ask the same question I asked Jason when he did this for FS...
did you verify that the new q_values is the same as the old one?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> This fixes a regression in the running time of Piglit introduced by
> commit 78e9043475d4bed8b50f7e413963c
This fixes a regression in the running time of Piglit introduced by
commit 78e9043475d4bed8b50f7e413963c960fa0935bb, which increased the
number of register allocation classes set up by the VEC4 back-end
from 2 to 16. The algorithm used by ra_set_finalize() to calculate
them is unnecessarily expens
