On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 7:19:24 PM PDT Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> >> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
> >> the
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
>> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
>> the field.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:02:58 AM PDT Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
> the field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
> ---
>
> PS: We can merge this with the previous patch too if that's better.
Since the enum is in the same header now, we can use it as the type of
the field.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Antognolli
---
PS: We can merge this with the previous patch too if that's better.
src/intel/compiler/brw_compiler.h | 2 +-
src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp |