On Tuesday 24 June 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
> Brian Paul writes:
> >> On Friday 28 February 2014, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> >> > It's possible that this patch fixes a segfault in FlightGear (see bug
> >> 73504),
> >> > so I think it's a candidate for the 10.1 branch, but maybe not for
> >> 10.1.0.
>
Brian Paul writes:
>> On Friday 28 February 2014, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
>> > It's possible that this patch fixes a segfault in FlightGear (see bug
>> 73504),
>> > so I think it's a candidate for the 10.1 branch, but maybe not for
>> 10.1.0.
>>
>> Ping?
>
> I took a look. I guess we don't have mu
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> On Friday 28 February 2014, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > Cc: "10.1"
> > ---
> > src/mesa/main/api_arrayelt.c | 111
> ++-
> > 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >
> > It's possible th
On Friday 28 February 2014, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> Cc: "10.1"
> ---
> src/mesa/main/api_arrayelt.c | 111
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> It's possible that this patch fixes a segfault in FlightGear (see bug 73504),
> so I
Cc: "10.1"
---
src/mesa/main/api_arrayelt.c | 111 ++-
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
It's possible that this patch fixes a segfault in FlightGear (see bug 73504),
so I think it's a candidate for the 10.1 branch, but maybe not for 10.1.0