Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: Drop PATH_MAX usage.

2016-11-15 Thread Roland Mainz
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:28:11 PM PST Roland Mainz wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >> > On 15 November 2016 at 20:04, Kenneth Graunke >> > wrote: >> >> GNU/Hurd does not define PATH_MAX since i

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: Drop PATH_MAX usage.

2016-11-15 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:28:11 PM PST Roland Mainz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: > > On 15 November 2016 at 20:04, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > >> GNU/Hurd does not define PATH_MAX since it doesn't have such arbitrary > >> limitation, so this failed to compi

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: Drop PATH_MAX usage.

2016-11-15 Thread Roland Mainz
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 15 November 2016 at 20:04, Kenneth Graunke wrote: >> GNU/Hurd does not define PATH_MAX since it doesn't have such arbitrary >> limitation, so this failed to compile. Apparently glibc does not >> enforce PATH_MAX restrictions anyway, so it

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: Drop PATH_MAX usage.

2016-11-15 Thread Emil Velikov
On 15 November 2016 at 20:04, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > GNU/Hurd does not define PATH_MAX since it doesn't have such arbitrary > limitation, so this failed to compile. Apparently glibc does not > enforce PATH_MAX restrictions anyway, so it's kind of a hoax: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/ma

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: Drop PATH_MAX usage.

2016-11-15 Thread Kenneth Graunke
GNU/Hurd does not define PATH_MAX since it doesn't have such arbitrary limitation, so this failed to compile. Apparently glibc does not enforce PATH_MAX restrictions anyway, so it's kind of a hoax: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Limits-for-Files.html MSVC uses a different nam