On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com
---
Thanks, R-b and pushed.
Apparently
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Signed-off-by:
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 08:01:26 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 17:06:03 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
On 12/19/2013 01:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com
It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
is still buggy, as it has no runtime check -
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com
---
Thanks, R-b and pushed.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Make this Bugzilla: ...
Sure, will do. But there are both conventions used, for example see:
On 12/19/2013 01:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
[snip]
Gallium has a cpu detect function that includes a SSE 4.1 cap. Perhaps
you'd like to move it to a common area and make use of it for runtime
detection?
Yes, that would be far better. The Mesa code has really rotted - it
only does CPU
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:57:16 -0800
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Make this Bugzilla: ...
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com
---
configure.ac| 6
m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4 | 72 +
src/mesa/Makefile.am| 6 +++-
3 files changed, 83
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
Make this Bugzilla: ...
It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
is still buggy, as it has no runtime check - would it not crash
if built on a
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72708
It seems to me that the Intel code that uses this SSE4.1 function
is still buggy, as it has no runtime check - would it not crash
if built on a SSE4-capable system but used with a lower-class cpu?
i965 systems = LGA775 = Pentium4 without
11 matches
Mail list logo
