On 05/04/2015 12:32 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 04/29/2015 02:44 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
On 04/29/2015 02:53 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 04/29/2015 12:07 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick
Along with a couple secondary goals, the dispatch sanity test had two
major, primary goals.
1. Ens
On 04/29/2015 02:44 PM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 02:53 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 04/29/2015 12:07 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> From: Ian Romanick
>>>
>>> Along with a couple secondary goals, the dispatch sanity test had two
>>> major, primary goals.
>>>
>>> 1. Ensure that all functions
On 04/29/2015 02:53 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 04/29/2015 12:07 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick
Along with a couple secondary goals, the dispatch sanity test had two
major, primary goals.
1. Ensure that all functions part of an API version are set in the
dispatch table.
2. Ens
On 04/29/2015 12:07 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> Along with a couple secondary goals, the dispatch sanity test had two
> major, primary goals.
>
> 1. Ensure that all functions part of an API version are set in the
>dispatch table.
>
> 2. Ensure that functions that cannot
From: Ian Romanick
Along with a couple secondary goals, the dispatch sanity test had two
major, primary goals.
1. Ensure that all functions part of an API version are set in the
dispatch table.
2. Ensure that functions that cannot be part of an API version are not
set in the dispatch tabl
