On Monday, 2018-02-19 11:20:37 +, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Friday, 2018-02-16 14:27:03 -0600, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:
> > ---
> > include/meson.build| 8 +
> > meson.build| 16 +++---
> > src/egl/meson.build
On Friday, 2018-02-16 14:27:03 -0600, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:
> ---
> include/meson.build| 8 +
> meson.build| 16 +++---
> src/egl/meson.build| 36 +++---
>
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 12:27:03)
> + link_with : [libglapi_static, libglapi],
> + dependencies : cpp.find_library('be'),
I think that we end up calling cpp.find_library('be') it might be worth just
adding this to the top meson.build file as dep_be, but I'm okay doing that as
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 14:07:26)
> On 16 February 2018 at 19:08, Alexander von Gluck IV
> wrote:
> > February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> >> Hi Alexander,
> >>
> >> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 14:21:52)
> On 16 February 2018 at 22:12, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
> >> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> >> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
On 16 February 2018 at 22:12, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
>> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
>> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
>> >> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov"
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 13:55:06)
> On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
> >> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov"
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Alexander,
> >> >
> >> >
On 16 February 2018 at 19:08, Alexander von Gluck IV
wrote:
> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
>> but have no way to test.
>
> I've been
On 16 February 2018 at 19:28, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
>> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
>> > Hi Alexander,
>> >
>> > Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin
---
include/meson.build| 8 +
meson.build| 16 +++---
src/egl/meson.build| 36 +++---
src/gallium/meson.build| 9 ++
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 10:46:59)
> On 16 February 2018 at 17:58, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Emil,
> >
> > If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
> > support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
> >
>
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-16 11:08:33)
> February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
> > but have no way to test.
>
> I've been focused on meson since
February 16, 2018 11:49 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
> but have no way to test.
I've been focused on meson since it's the future.
Feel free to re-spin them if you have the bandwidth.
On 16 February 2018 at 17:58, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Emil,
>
> If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
> support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
>
What's wrong with having it until then? Comparing the two
Emil,
If meson is going to work for their needs it seems silly to merge autotools
support, when the plan is to drop autotools from mesa in the coming year.
Dylan
Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-02-16 09:49:37)
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
Hi Alexander,
Did you drop the ball on the autotools patches? I could re-spin them
but have no way to test.
There's a couple of comments inline, but nothing major.
On 16 February 2018 at 00:32, Alexander von Gluck IV
wrote:
> --- a/meson.build
> +++ b/meson.build
>
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 16:58:35)
> February 15, 2018 6:36 PM, "Dylan Baker" wrote:
>
> > Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 16:04:37)
> >
> >> I'm actually not 100% sure here. I have missing symbols at link without
> >> both
> >> included. More
February 15, 2018 6:36 PM, "Dylan Baker" wrote:
> Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 16:04:37)
>
>> I'm actually not 100% sure here. I have missing symbols at link without both
>> included. More investigation needed on my part.
>
> That may be my fault, on Linux
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 16:04:37)
> I'm actually not 100% sure here. I have missing symbols at link without both
> included. More investigation needed on my part.
That may be my fault, on Linux and the BSDs have have to have shared_glapi
because you need it to do GLES, but if
---
include/meson.build| 8 +
meson.build| 18 +++
src/egl/meson.build| 34 -
src/gallium/meson.build| 9 ++
February 15, 2018 5:37 PM, "Dylan Baker" wrote:
> Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 13:12:40)
>
>> ---
>> include/meson.build | 8 +
>> meson.build | 18 +++---
>> src/egl/meson.build | 33 +
>> src/gallium/meson.build | 9 +
>>
Quoting Alexander von Gluck IV (2018-02-15 13:12:40)
> ---
> include/meson.build| 8 +
> meson.build| 18 +++---
> src/egl/meson.build| 33 +
> src/gallium/meson.build
February 15, 2018 3:22 PM, "Alexander von Gluck IV"
wrote:
> ---
> include/meson.build | 8 +
> meson.build | 18 +++---
> src/egl/meson.build | 35 +-
> src/gallium/meson.build | 9 +
> src/gallium/state_trackers/hgl/meson.build | 41
---
include/meson.build| 8 +
meson.build| 18 +++---
src/egl/meson.build| 35 +-
src/gallium/meson.build| 9 +
---
include/meson.build| 8 +
meson.build| 18 +++---
src/egl/meson.build| 33 +
src/gallium/meson.build| 9 +
25 matches
Mail list logo