Quoting Scott D Phillips (2018-01-24 11:13:14)
> Dylan Baker writes:
>
> > Matt and I talked about whether we needed the compile check, he didn't
> > think we
> > did because we required a GCC that has msse4.1 support, but the HAVE vs USE
> > is
> > a real bug (someone
Dylan Baker writes:
> Matt and I talked about whether we needed the compile check, he didn't think
> we
> did because we required a GCC that has msse4.1 support, but the HAVE vs USE is
> a real bug (someone else noticed that too).
>
> CC'ing Matt in case I'm
Matt and I talked about whether we needed the compile check, he didn't think we
did because we required a GCC that has msse4.1 support, but the HAVE vs USE is
a real bug (someone else noticed that too).
CC'ing Matt in case I'm miss-remembering something.
Quoting Scott D Phillips (2018-01-24
Before we were adding -DHAVE_SSE41 which isn't what the code is
looking for, so some uses of the sse4.1 code were always being
skipped.
Fixes: 84486f6462 ("meson: Enable SSE4.1 optimizations")
---
meson.build | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git