Am 18.11.2014 um 05:03 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
For values above integer accuracy in floats, val - floor(val) might
actually produce a value greater than 1. For such large floats, it's
reasonable to be imprecise, but it's unreasonable for FRC to return a
value that is not between 0 and 1.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 05:03 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
For values above integer accuracy in floats, val - floor(val) might
actually produce a value greater than 1. For such large floats, it's
reasonable to be imprecise, but
Am 18.11.2014 um 15:05 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 05:03 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
For values above integer accuracy in floats, val - floor(val) might
actually produce a value greater than 1. For such large
On 18/11/14 14:34, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 15:05 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 05:03 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
For values above integer accuracy in floats, val - floor(val) might
actually
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Jose Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On 18/11/14 14:34, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 15:05 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
wrote:
Am 18.11.2014 um 05:03 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
For
For values above integer accuracy in floats, val - floor(val) might
actually produce a value greater than 1. For such large floats, it's
reasonable to be imprecise, but it's unreasonable for FRC to return a
value that is not between 0 and 1.
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu
---
