Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: reset the base offset for indirect images accesses

On 07/05/2016 12:57 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: This makes the code identical to the new code I added in suq handling? If so, r-b. As a separate patch, I'd encourage a refactor of the logic. Sure, this was my plan too. On Jul 4, 2016 6:08 PM, "Samuel Pitoiset"

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: reset the base offset for indirect images accesses

This makes the code identical to the new code I added in suq handling? If so, r-b. As a separate patch, I'd encourage a refactor of the logic. On Jul 4, 2016 6:08 PM, "Samuel Pitoiset" wrote: > In presence of an indirect image access, the base offset should be >

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nvc0/ir: reset the base offset for indirect images accesses

In presence of an indirect image access, the base offset should be zeroed because the stride will be computed twice. This is a pretty rare situation but it can happen when tex.r > 0. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset Cc: "11.2 12.0" ---