On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This seems more in line with what the documentation suggests we should be
> doing. It doesn't fix the rv635 regression, though I thought it might,
> so it means I've no idea whats actually going wrong there.
Patch looks g
From: Dave Airlie
This seems more in line with what the documentation suggests we should be
doing. It doesn't fix the rv635 regression, though I thought it might,
so it means I've no idea whats actually going wrong there.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/gallium/winsys/r600/drm/r600_hw_conte
