On 2 April 2017 at 22:43, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> We want the guardband_x/y to be the largerst scalars such that each
> viewport scaled by that amount is still a subrange of [-32767, 32767].
>
> The old code has a couple of issues:
> 1) It used scissor instead of
We want the guardband_x/y to be the largerst scalars such that each
viewport scaled by that amount is still a subrange of [-32767, 32767].
The old code has a couple of issues:
1) It used scissor instead of viewport_scissor, potentially taking into
account a viewport that is too small and