On 19/11/14 17:21, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 19/11/2014 15:25, Jose Fonseca wrote:
No idea. But the impression I generally have is MinGW has come a long
way since then (3 years ago.)
I think there was at least one bug in mesa which prevented this from
working, see commit cedfd79b
Yes, you're
From: José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com
This reverts f4dd0991719ef3e2606920c5100b372181c60899.
The src/gallium/tests/unit/translate_test.c gives the same results on
MinGW 64-bits as on Linux 64-bits. And since MinGW is often used for
development/testing due to its convenience, it's better not to
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com
Do you know if that's due to MinGW changes or something else why it no
longer causes crashes?
Roland
Am 19.11.2014 um 13:10 schrieb jfons...@vmware.com:
From: José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com
This reverts
On 19/11/2014 15:25, Jose Fonseca wrote:
No idea. But the impression I generally have is MinGW has come a long
way since then (3 years ago.)
I think there was at least one bug in mesa which prevented this from
working, see commit cedfd79b
___
Am 19.11.2014 um 18:21 schrieb Jon TURNEY:
On 19/11/2014 15:25, Jose Fonseca wrote:
No idea. But the impression I generally have is MinGW has come a long
way since then (3 years ago.)
I think there was at least one bug in mesa which prevented this from
working, see commit cedfd79b
Ah yes
