Ah that's what I did first, but figured it was probably in accurate naming
after that
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 08:21 Axel Davy wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> We really want not to use user index buffers when csmt is active (thus
> the !This->csmt_active).
> This should be a one line patch to just remove th
Hi Mike,
We really want not to use user index buffers when csmt is active (thus
the !This->csmt_active).
This should be a one line patch to just remove the part
GET_PCAP(USER_INDEX_BUFFERS)
Yours,
Axel Davy
On 25/02/2017 06:23, Mike Lothian wrote:
This fixes 4a883966c1f74f43afc145d2c3d27af
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Mike Lothian wrote:
> This fixes 4a883966c1f74f43afc145d2c3d27af7b8c5e01a where the pipe cap
> was removed
>
> Now USER_INDEX_BUFFERS are always enabled remove code that checks for
> them and works around them not being available
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Lothian
>
This fixes 4a883966c1f74f43afc145d2c3d27af7b8c5e01a where the pipe cap
was removed
Now USER_INDEX_BUFFERS are always enabled remove code that checks for
them and works around them not being available
Signed-off-by: Mike Lothian
Cc: Marek Olšák
Cc: Axel Davy
---
src/gallium/state_trackers/nine
