On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Axel Davy wrote:
> Do we need the #ifndef WINAPI part ?
>
> Axel
>
>
> On 29/04/2016 20:53, Christian Schmidbauer wrote:
>>
>> As Emil pointed out, only gcc, clang and MSVC compatibility is required.
>> Hence the check for GNUC can be skipped, as __i386__ and __x86_
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 19:53, Christian Schmidbauer
> wrote:
>> As Emil pointed out, only gcc, clang and MSVC compatibility is required.
>> Hence the check for GNUC can be skipped, as __i386__ and __x86_64__ are
>> only defined
Do we need the #ifndef WINAPI part ?
Axel
On 29/04/2016 20:53, Christian Schmidbauer wrote:
As Emil pointed out, only gcc, clang and MSVC compatibility is required.
Hence the check for GNUC can be skipped, as __i386__ and __x86_64__ are
only defined for gcc/clang, not for MSVC.
Remove the #und
Hi Christian,
On 29 April 2016 at 19:53, Christian Schmidbauer
wrote:
> As Emil pointed out, only gcc, clang and MSVC compatibility is required.
> Hence the check for GNUC can be skipped, as __i386__ and __x86_64__ are
> only defined for gcc/clang, not for MSVC.
>
> Remove the #undef which has be
As Emil pointed out, only gcc, clang and MSVC compatibility is required.
Hence the check for GNUC can be skipped, as __i386__ and __x86_64__ are
only defined for gcc/clang, not for MSVC.
Remove the #undef which has been there for historic reasons, when wine
dlls for nine have been built inside mes
