On 13 February 2018 at 23:00, Kyriazis, George
wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:54 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Andres Gomez (2018-02-13 14:42:57)
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> -if with_amd_vk or with_gallium_radeonsi
>>> +if with_amd_vk or
> On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:54 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
>
> Quoting Andres Gomez (2018-02-13 14:42:57)
> [snip]
>>
>> -if with_amd_vk or with_gallium_radeonsi
>> +if with_amd_vk or with_gallium_radeonsi or with_gallium_swr
>> _llvm_version = '>= 4.0.0'
>> -elif
I am not an expert on all the changes needed for travis and packaging, but the
swr changes look good.
Reviewed-by: George Kyriazis
>
On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Andres Gomez
> wrote:
Quoting Andres Gomez (2018-02-13 14:42:57)
[snip]
>
> -if with_amd_vk or with_gallium_radeonsi
> +if with_amd_vk or with_gallium_radeonsi or with_gallium_swr
>_llvm_version = '>= 4.0.0'
> -elif with_gallium_opencl or with_gallium_swr or with_gallium_r600
> +elif with_gallium_opencl or
Since radv and radeonsi removed support for LLVM 3.9 the distcheck
target got broken because SWR distribution needed 3.9.x.
After checking with George Kyriazis, SWR is OK with moving to LLVM 4.0
and above, which will solve this problem.
Fixes: 3bf1e036e8a ("amd: remove support for LLVM 3.9")
Cc: