Am 23.07.2014 05:54, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still
On 23.07.2014 15:42, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.07.2014 05:54, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use
Am 23.07.2014 09:21, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 23.07.2014 15:42, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.07.2014 05:54, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 23.07.2014 15:42, Christian König wrote:
Am 23.07.2014 05:54, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for
On 21.07.2014 17:07, Christian König wrote:
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still
Am 19.07.2014 03:15, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still don't understand
the reason why it's faster
On 18.07.2014 12:58, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 17.07.2014 19:09, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still don't understand
the reason why it's faster than with GTT. Definitely needs more testing
on a wider range of systems.
Sure. If anyone
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 17.07.2014 19:09, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
In order to try and improve X(Shm)PutImage performance with glamor, I
implemented support for write-combined CPU mappings of BOs in GTT.
This did provide a nice
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still don't understand
the reason why it's faster than
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this
On 19.07.2014 00:47, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.07.2014 05:07, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
[PATCH 5/5] drm/radeon: Use VRAM for indirect buffers on = SI
I'm still not very keen with this change since I still don't understand
the reason why it's faster than with GTT. Definitely needs more testing
In order to try and improve X(Shm)PutImage performance with glamor, I
implemented support for write-combined CPU mappings of BOs in GTT.
This did provide a nice speedup, but to my surprise, using VRAM instead
of write-combined GTT turned out to be even faster in general on my
Kaveri machine, both
Am 17.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
In order to try and improve X(Shm)PutImage performance with glamor, I
implemented support for write-combined CPU mappings of BOs in GTT.
This did provide a nice speedup, but to my surprise, using VRAM instead
of write-combined GTT turned out to be
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
Mesa patches:
[PATCH 1/5] winsys/radeon: Use separate caching buffer managers for
[PATCH 2/5] r600g/radeonsi: Use write-combined CPU mappings of some
[PATCH 3/5] r600g/radeonsi: Prefer VRAM for CPU - GPU streaming
For
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
In order to try and improve X(Shm)PutImage performance with glamor, I
implemented support for write-combined CPU mappings of BOs in GTT.
This did provide a nice speedup, but to my surprise, using VRAM instead
of
On 17.07.2014 19:09, Christian König wrote:
Am 17.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
In order to try and improve X(Shm)PutImage performance with glamor, I
implemented support for write-combined CPU mappings of BOs in GTT.
This did provide a nice speedup, but to my surprise, using VRAM
18 matches
Mail list logo