Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] EGL_MESA_platform_surfaceless (v2)

2016-10-17 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 10:48 -0700, Chad Versace wrote: > Some people privately asked why we need to create this EGL platform. > I want to respond publicly. > > Mesa *already* *has* this EGL platform. In my view, the issue at hand > isn't whether to create or to not create the platform. It's

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] EGL_MESA_platform_surfaceless (v2)

2016-10-14 Thread Chad Versace
Some people privately asked why we need to create this EGL platform. I want to respond publicly. Mesa *already* *has* this EGL platform. In my view, the issue at hand isn't whether to create or to not create the platform. It's whether to specify its behavior (formally in an extension spec) or

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] EGL_MESA_platform_surfaceless (v2)

2016-10-14 Thread Emil Velikov
On 13 October 2016 at 23:06, Chad Versace wrote: > Mesa's EGL has supported Chrome OS's "surfaceless" platform for many > months, but the behavior of that platform has never been documented. > Here's my attempt to fix that. > > I've already committed the draft extension

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] EGL_MESA_platform_surfaceless (v2)

2016-10-13 Thread Chad Versace
Mesa's EGL has supported Chrome OS's "surfaceless" platform for many months, but the behavior of that platform has never been documented. Here's my attempt to fix that. I've already committed the draft extension spec into the private Khronos registry. After these patches land in master, I plan to