On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 10:48 -0700, Chad Versace wrote:
> Some people privately asked why we need to create this EGL platform.
> I want to respond publicly.
>
> Mesa *already* *has* this EGL platform. In my view, the issue at hand
> isn't whether to create or to not create the platform. It's
Some people privately asked why we need to create this EGL platform.
I want to respond publicly.
Mesa *already* *has* this EGL platform. In my view, the issue at hand
isn't whether to create or to not create the platform. It's whether to
specify its behavior (formally in an extension spec) or
On 13 October 2016 at 23:06, Chad Versace wrote:
> Mesa's EGL has supported Chrome OS's "surfaceless" platform for many
> months, but the behavior of that platform has never been documented.
> Here's my attempt to fix that.
>
> I've already committed the draft extension
Mesa's EGL has supported Chrome OS's "surfaceless" platform for many
months, but the behavior of that platform has never been documented.
Here's my attempt to fix that.
I've already committed the draft extension spec into the private Khronos
registry. After these patches land in master, I plan to