On 30/08/17 11:30, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:10 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
You can find this series on github :
https://github.com/djdeath/mesa/tree/wip/djdeath/drop-is-has-brw
(One paches got caught by the mailing list's size limit)
Assuming there is no
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:10 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> You can find this series on github :
> https://github.com/djdeath/mesa/tree/wip/djdeath/drop-is-has-brw
>
> (One paches got caught by the mailing list's size limit)
>
Assuming there is no regressions on Intel CI, series is:
You can find this series on github :
https://github.com/djdeath/mesa/tree/wip/djdeath/drop-is-has-brw
(One paches got caught by the mailing list's size limit)
On 30/08/17 11:07, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Hi all,
Following a quick discussion on IRC, Matt reminded me we still had
some
Hi all,
Following a quick discussion on IRC, Matt reminded me we still had
some duplicated fields on brw_context which just hold the same values
as gen_device_info. Let's just use gen_device_info instead.
Cheers,
Lionel Landwerlin (16):
anv: use device->info instead of brw->is_*
i965: drop
