On 10/11/2011 09:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:31:44 -0700, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> Using the constant cache for reads isn't going to work for scratch
>> reads (variably-indexed arrays or register spills), as these aren't
>> constant at all.
>>
>> Also, in the new VS back
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:31:44 -0700, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> Using the constant cache for reads isn't going to work for scratch
> reads (variably-indexed arrays or register spills), as these aren't
> constant at all.
>
> Also, in the new VS backend, use the proper message number for OWord
> Dual
Using the constant cache for reads isn't going to work for scratch
reads (variably-indexed arrays or register spills), as these aren't
constant at all.
Also, in the new VS backend, use the proper message number for OWord
Dual Block Write messages. It's now 10, instead of 9. Prior to this,
we wer