Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-28 Thread Emil Velikov
amdgpu/sw was just a (not so good) example. The only user that I can think of is fbdev, although with st/egl gone we're rather far from it. -Emil On 28 April 2015 at 09:37, Marek Olšák wrote: > I was asking about winsys/amdgpu/sw. I had no problem with moving > radeon_winsys.h. > > Marek > > On

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-28 Thread Marek Olšák
I was asking about winsys/amdgpu/sw. I had no problem with moving radeon_winsys.h. Marek On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 28 April 2015 at 07:51, Chia-I Wu wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >>> On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Michel Dänzer

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 28 April 2015 at 07:51, Chia-I Wu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Emil Velikov > wrote: >> On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> On 28.04.2015 03:57, Marek Olšák wrote: Can you elaborate on what amdgpu/sw would be good for? Frankly I don't see a point, there

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-27 Thread Chia-I Wu
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On 28.04.2015 03:57, Marek Olšák wrote: >>> Can you elaborate on what amdgpu/sw would be good for? Frankly I don't >>> see a point, therefore we don't need the "drm" subdirectory. >> >> I thi

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-27 Thread Emil Velikov
On 28 April 2015 at 03:30, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 28.04.2015 03:57, Marek Olšák wrote: >> Can you elaborate on what amdgpu/sw would be good for? Frankly I don't >> see a point, therefore we don't need the "drm" subdirectory. > > I think Emil's main point (which I agree with) is that radeon_wins

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-27 Thread Michel Dänzer
On 28.04.2015 03:57, Marek Olšák wrote: > Can you elaborate on what amdgpu/sw would be good for? Frankly I don't > see a point, therefore we don't need the "drm" subdirectory. I think Emil's main point (which I agree with) is that radeon_winsys.h should live somewhere under src/gallium/drivers/, p

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-27 Thread Marek Olšák
Can you elaborate on what amdgpu/sw would be good for? Frankly I don't see a point, therefore we don't need the "drm" subdirectory. Marek On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 20/04/15 22:23, Marek Olšák wrote: >> From: Marek Olšák >> >> --- >> .../auxiliary/target-helpers/

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-21 Thread Emil Velikov
On 20/04/15 22:23, Marek Olšák wrote: > From: Marek Olšák > > --- > .../auxiliary/target-helpers/inline_drm_helper.h | 6 +- > src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_chipset.c| 2 +- > src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_context.h| 1 - > src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.h

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 01/18] winsys/radeon: move radeon_winsys.h up one directory

2015-04-20 Thread Marek Olšák
From: Marek Olšák --- .../auxiliary/target-helpers/inline_drm_helper.h | 6 +- src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_chipset.c| 2 +- src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_context.h| 1 - src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_screen.h | 2 +- src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600