On 04/06/2015 11:35 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> On SNB+, the Boolean result is always 0 or ~0, so MOV.nz produces the
>> same effect as AND.nz. However, later cmod propagation passes can
>> handle the MOV.nz, but they
On 04/06/2015 11:35 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> On SNB+, the Boolean result is always 0 or ~0, so MOV.nz produces the
>> same effect as AND.nz. However, later cmod propagation passes can
>> handle the MOV.nz, but they
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> On SNB+, the Boolean result is always 0 or ~0, so MOV.nz produces the
> same effect as AND.nz. However, later cmod propagation passes can
> handle the MOV.nz, but they cannot handle the AND.nz because the source
> is n
From: Ian Romanick
On SNB+, the Boolean result is always 0 or ~0, so MOV.nz produces the
same effect as AND.nz. However, later cmod propagation passes can
handle the MOV.nz, but they cannot handle the AND.nz because the source
is not generated by a CMP.
It's worth noting that this commit was a
