Latest version is
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:41 PM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Cool, thanks!
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:38 PM Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <
> caio.olive...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> > > > > +{
>> > > > > + bool progress = false;
>> > > > > +
>> > >
Cool, thanks!
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:38 PM Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <
caio.olive...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + bool progress = false;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* Find writes that are unused and can be removed. */
> > > > > +
> > > > +{
> > > > + bool progress = false;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Find writes that are unused and can be removed. */
> > > > + util_dynarray_foreach_reverse(unused_writes, struct write_entry,
> > > > entry) {
> > > > + nir_deref_compare_result comp = nir_compare_derefs(dst,
> >
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:37 PM Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <
caio.olive...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > +{
> > > + bool progress = false;
> > > +
> > > + /* Find writes that are unused and can be removed. */
> > > + util_dynarray_foreach_reverse(unused_writes, struct write_entry,
>
Hi,
> > +{
> > + bool progress = false;
> > +
> > + /* Find writes that are unused and can be removed. */
> > + util_dynarray_foreach_reverse(unused_writes, struct write_entry,
> > entry) {
> > + nir_deref_compare_result comp = nir_compare_derefs(dst, entry->dst);
> > + if (comp &
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:46 AM Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <
caio.olive...@intel.com> wrote:
> Instead of doing this as part of the existing copy_prop_vars pass.
>
> Separation makes easier to expand the scope of both passes to be more
> than per-block. For copy propagation, the information
Instead of doing this as part of the existing copy_prop_vars pass.
Separation makes easier to expand the scope of both passes to be more
than per-block. For copy propagation, the information about valid
copies comes from previous instructions; while the dead write removal
depends on information
