On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Emil Velikov
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 July 2016 at 14:36, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa
On 19 July 2016 at 14:36, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Emil Velikov
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 18 July 2016 at 16:38, Tomasz Figa
On 19 July 2016 at 04:21, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 18 July 2016 at 16:38, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Emil Velikov
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 16:38, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 18 July 2016 at 13:02, Tomasz Figa
On 18 July 2016 at 16:38, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 18 July 2016 at 13:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Emil Velikov
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 13:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Tomasz,
>>>
>>> On 15 July 2016 at 08:53, Tomasz Figa
On 18 July 2016 at 13:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> On 15 July 2016 at 08:53, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> We can support render nodes alone without any private
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On 15 July 2016 at 08:53, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> We can support render nodes alone without any private headers, so let's
>> make support for control nodes depend on presence of
Hi Tomasz,
On 15 July 2016 at 08:53, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> We can support render nodes alone without any private headers, so let's
> make support for control nodes depend on presence of private drm_gralloc
> headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
> ---
>
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> We can support render nodes alone without any private headers, so let's
>> make support for control nodes depend on presence of private drm_gralloc
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> We can support render nodes alone without any private headers, so let's
> make support for control nodes depend on presence of private drm_gralloc
> headers.
This is a complicated change for what amounts to just needing
We can support render nodes alone without any private headers, so let's
make support for control nodes depend on presence of private drm_gralloc
headers.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa
---
src/egl/Android.mk | 1 +
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h |
15 matches
Mail list logo