This option was useful during initial development, but it's been ages since I've heard of anyone using it. Plus, Gen7+ mandates separate stencil, so it was really only useful on Sandybridge anyway.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c | 27 --------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c index 741b554..bbeb20a 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c @@ -1004,31 +1004,6 @@ intel_init_bufmgr(struct intel_screen *intelScreen) return true; } -/** - * Override intel_screen.hw_has_separate_stencil with environment variable - * INTEL_SEPARATE_STENCIL. - * - * Valid values for INTEL_SEPARATE_STENCIL are "0" and "1". If an invalid - * valid value is encountered, a warning is emitted and INTEL_SEPARATE_STENCIL - * is ignored. - */ -static void -intel_override_separate_stencil(struct intel_screen *screen) -{ - const char *s = getenv("INTEL_SEPARATE_STENCIL"); - if (!s) { - return; - } else if (!strncmp("0", s, 2)) { - screen->hw_has_separate_stencil = false; - } else if (!strncmp("1", s, 2)) { - screen->hw_has_separate_stencil = true; - } else { - fprintf(stderr, - "warning: env variable INTEL_SEPARATE_STENCIL=\"%s\" has " - "invalid value and is ignored", s); - } -} - static bool intel_detect_swizzling(struct intel_screen *screen) { @@ -1276,8 +1251,6 @@ __DRIconfig **intelInitScreen2(__DRIscreen *psp) else if (!success && intelScreen->gen >= 6) intelScreen->hw_has_llc = true; - intel_override_separate_stencil(intelScreen); - intelScreen->hw_has_swizzling = intel_detect_swizzling(intelScreen); set_max_gl_versions(intelScreen); -- 1.8.3.4 _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev