On 01/13/2014 10:28 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The original intent was that we'd keep a driver-private copy, and there
> would be the normal copy for swrast to make use of without the tuning (or
> anything more invasive we might do) specific to i965. Only, we don't
> generate swrast code any more, b
The original intent was that we'd keep a driver-private copy, and there
would be the normal copy for swrast to make use of without the tuning (or
anything more invasive we might do) specific to i965. Only, we don't
generate swrast code any more, because swrast can't render current shaders
anyway.