On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:54:43 -0800
Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com writes:
Forgot to mention, this would appear to make 3d impossible without udev
(ie, static devices, mdev, or other solutions).
No, DRI2 continues to fall back to using the driver
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:46:21 -0800
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
have a portable solution yet, but presumably it will similar lookup based
on
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:16:05 +0200
Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:46:21 -0800
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
Lauri Kasanen c...@gmx.com writes:
Forgot to mention, this would appear to make 3d impossible without udev
(ie, static devices, mdev, or other solutions).
No, DRI2 continues to fall back to using the driver provided by the X
server if it can't find one locally.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
The loader infrastructure for everything but DRI2 requires that udev be
present, so we can figure out an appropriate driver from the fd. We don't
have a portable solution yet, but presumably it will similar lookup based
on the device node.
It will also be even more required for krh's udev-based
