It looks like we could want this into -stable (?)
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 19:33 +0300, Plamena Manolova wrote:
> In blit_framebuffer we're already doing a NULL
> pointer check for readFb and drawFb so it makes
> sense to do it before we actually use the pointers.
>
> CID: 1412569
> Signed-off-by: P
Thank you Rafael :)
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Rafael Antognolli <
rafael.antogno...@intel.com> wrote:
> Indeed the other two commits are related to the no_error path, but I
> think at least this one should be applied. So it is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 a
Indeed the other two commits are related to the no_error path, but I
think at least this one should be applied. So it is:
Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:33:12PM +0300, Plamena Manolova wrote:
> In blit_framebuffer we're already doing a NULL
> pointer check for readFb a
In blit_framebuffer we're already doing a NULL
pointer check for readFb and drawFb so it makes
sense to do it before we actually use the pointers.
CID: 1412569
Signed-off-by: Plamena Manolova
---
src/mesa/main/blit.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git