From: Ian Romanick
On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following piglit tests:
gl-1.0-beginend-coverage gltexparameter[if]{v,}
push-pop-texture-state
texwrap 1d
texwrap 1d proj
texwrap 2d proj
texwrap formats
All
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
> GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following piglit tests:
>
> gl-1.0-beginend-coverage gltexparameter[if]{v,}
> push-pop-texture-state
> texwrap
On 06/27/2017 11:23 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
>> GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following piglit tests:
>>
>> gl-1.0-beginend-coverage gltexparameter
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 11:23 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> From: Ian Romanick
>>>
>>> On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
>>> GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following pi
Ian, it looks like we could want this patch (and the others from the
series when they land) in -stable (?)
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 10:09 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
> GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following pi
Ian Romanick writes:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> On NV20 (and probably also on earlier NV GPUs that lack
> GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp) fixes the following piglit tests:
>
> gl-1.0-beginend-coverage gltexparameter[if]{v,}
> push-pop-texture-state
> texwrap 1d
> texwrap 1d proj
>
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 02:03 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Ian, it looks like we could want this patch (and the others from the
> series when they land) in -stable (?)
>
As we are preparing a new stable 17.1 release, gently pinging.
J.A.
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 10:09 -0700, Ian Romanick
On 09/20/2017 03:12 AM, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 02:03 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
>> Ian, it looks like we could want this patch (and the others from the
>> series when they land) in -stable (?)
>>
>
> As we are preparing a new stable 17.1 release, gently pinging.
>
I