Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/3] nine: Don't use the otherwise-dead SFL opcode in an unreachable path.

Axel Davy axel.d...@ens.fr writes: Hi, Series looks good. You can add my r-b. Do you want also to remove the DP2A reference like did Jose patch ? The rest of my series doesn't touch DP2A, so I wasn't planning on it. pgpq8Vu6pmNT9.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/3] nine: Don't use the otherwise-dead SFL opcode in an unreachable path.

Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg da...@ixit.cz for the series. David ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/3] nine: Don't use the otherwise-dead SFL opcode in an unreachable path.

--- src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_shader.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_shader.c b/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_shader.c index cc027b4..9b324c3 100644 --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_shader.c

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/3] nine: Don't use the otherwise-dead SFL opcode in an unreachable path.

Hi, Series looks good. You can add my r-b. Do you want also to remove the DP2A reference like did Jose patch ? Axel Davy On 20/11/2014 23:31, Eric Anholt wrote : --- src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_shader.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git