Pushed!
Tim, this is going to cause you a bit of rebase trouble on loop unrolling
but it should actually make your code simpler.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2016 21:42, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for doing this! This has always bugged me. For th
On Oct 5, 2016 21:42, "Connor Abbott" wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this! This has always bugged me. For the series,
Yeah, nir_loop_last_cf_node and friends in particular have been bugging me
for a lng time.
> Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott
Thanks!
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Jason Ekstr
Thanks for doing this! This has always bugged me. For the series,
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This makes calling nir_foo_as_bar a bit safer because we're no longer 100%
> trusting in the caller to ensure that it's safe. The caller still n
This makes calling nir_foo_as_bar a bit safer because we're no longer 100%
trusting in the caller to ensure that it's safe. The caller still needs to
do the right thing but this ensures that we catch invalid casts with an
assert rather than by reading garbage data. The one downside is that we do
