On 09/08/15 21:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 09/08/15 21:21, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 09.08.2015 um 20:08 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
On 09/08/15 17:47, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca
wrote:
Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a
problem
On 09/08/15 21:21, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 09.08.2015 um 20:08 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
On 09/08/15 17:47, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a
problem as
it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (
Am 09.08.2015 um 20:08 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
> On 09/08/15 17:47, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a
>>> problem as
>>> it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
>>>
>>> Howev
On 09/08/15 19:08, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 09/08/15 17:47, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a
problem as
it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
However on Windows long type is
On 09/08/15 17:47, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a problem as
it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
However on Windows long type is guaranteed to be 32bits.
Also add an #
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a problem as
> it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
>
> However on Windows long type is guaranteed to be 32bits.
>
> Also add an #error, as GCC will just warn, n
Am 09.08.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
> Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a problem as
> it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
>
> However on Windows long type is guaranteed to be 32bits.
>
> Also add an #error, as GCC will just warn, not thr
Neither MSVC nor MinGW defines LONG_BIT. For MSVC this was not a problem as
it doesn't define __x86_64__ macro (it's GCC specific.)
However on Windows long type is guaranteed to be 32bits.
Also add an #error, as GCC will just warn, not throw any error, when no
value is returned.
Trivial.
---
s
