brw->wm.prog_data is covered by CACHE_NEW_WM_PROG, not
BRW_NEW_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM. So, we should listen to it.
However, I believe that BRW_NEW_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM is sufficient to cover
all the necessary cases - CACHE_NEW_WM_PROG happens in a subset of
cases. So, the code being wrong shouldn't have t
Series Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen
On 2014-11-24 22:03:10, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> brw->wm.prog_data is covered by CACHE_NEW_WM_PROG, not
> BRW_NEW_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM. So, we should listen to it.
>
> However, I believe that BRW_NEW_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM is sufficient to cover
> all the necessary cases
