On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
> NOTE: The commit message is retained for posterity, however there were some
> changes in the code since the patch was originally written that may make
> the old
> commit message false. Starting with v4 is actually much simpler than the
> orig
NOTE: The commit message is retained for posterity, however there were some
changes in the code since the patch was originally written that may make the old
commit message false. Starting with v4 is actually much simpler than the
original change.
This patch is needed to help keep some of the churn
Ben Widawsky writes:
> This patch actually addresses two potential issues:
> 1. As far as I can tell, drm_intel_gem_bo_alloc_tiled() which is invariably
> called, can potentially change the tiling type. Therefore, we shouldn't be
> checking the requested tiling type, but rather the granted tilin
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Ben Widawsky
wrote:
> IMHO, intel_miptree_choose_tiling() is an unfortunate incarnation because it
> conflates what is permitted vs. what is desirable. This makes doing any sort
> of
> "fallback" operations after the fact somewhat kludgey.
>
> The original code bas
IMHO, intel_miptree_choose_tiling() is an unfortunate incarnation because it
conflates what is permitted vs. what is desirable. This makes doing any sort of
"fallback" operations after the fact somewhat kludgey.
The original code basically says:
"if we requested x XOR y-tiled, and the region > ape
