You are absolutly right. I followed the way specification illustrate
implementation for simplicity reasons but had always in mind that this
was not the way to get any performance
benefit and hoped that I are somebody else could improve this later.
That's a great thing you already did this and don't
On 01/07/2014 12:49 AM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
Maxence, while I think it's great that you're interested in working
on this extension, I'm afraid I have another implementation in
a branch in my mesa tree:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~fredrik/mesa/log/?h%
Maxence, while I think it's great that you're interested in working
on this extension, I'm afraid I have another implementation in
a branch in my mesa tree:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~fredrik/mesa/log/?h=arb-multi-bind
I've looked at your patches, and noticed you've implemented the
functions by
On 01/02/2014 04:27 PM, Maxence Le Doré wrote:
> ---
> src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 158
> ++
> src/mesa/main/bufferobj.h | 9 ++-
> 2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferob
On 01/03/2014 06:39 AM, servuswiege...@yahoo.de wrote:
when you create the patches with git, you can add --cover-letter to the
command line. then you get a PATCH 0/X file with an overview over all
changes and a central place where you can describe what you've done in
general/which extension etc.
when you create the patches with git, you can add --cover-letter to the
command line. then you get a PATCH 0/X file with an overview over all
changes and a central place where you can describe what you've done in
general/which extension etc.
On 03.01.2014 01:27, Maxence Le Doré wrote:
> ---
> src
---
src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 158 ++
src/mesa/main/bufferobj.h | 9 ++-
2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
index a3d8f24..bad8f90 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/bufferob
