On 02/15/2016 07:12 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:38 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>> This is usually handled by the backends in order to handle the
>> various interactions with the gl_*Color built-ins.
>>
>> The problem is this means linking will fail if one side on the
>> interf
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 09:04 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 16:12 +0100, Iago Toral wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:38 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > > This is usually handled by the backends in order to handle the
> > > various interactions with the gl_*Color built-ins.
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 16:12 +0100, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:38 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > This is usually handled by the backends in order to handle the
> > various interactions with the gl_*Color built-ins.
> >
> > The problem is this means linking will fail if one side
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 18:38 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> This is usually handled by the backends in order to handle the
> various interactions with the gl_*Color built-ins.
>
> The problem is this means linking will fail if one side on the
> interface adds the smooth qualifier to the varying and
This is usually handled by the backends in order to handle the
various interactions with the gl_*Color built-ins.
The problem is this means linking will fail if one side on the
interface adds the smooth qualifier to the varying and the other
side just uses the default even though they match.
This
